CZON

Guide to Philosophical Speculative Style Analysis Reports

Prompt Engineering

👤 Readers who enjoy deep thinking and philosophy enthusiasts, seeking to enhance cognitive levels.
This document is a guide for philosophical speculative style analysis reports, aiming to instruct how to extract structured information from documents, such as file paths, core propositions, value judgments, and essential inquiries. It details reading focus points, including discussions on themes like existence, freedom, and meaning; provides the structure of the knowledge base, such as file indexes, proposition indexes, and value judgment indexes; and specifies required section structures, such as introduction, proposition analysis, and spiritual portrait. The document emphasizes logical reasoning, references to philosophical theories, and avoids empty terminology accumulation. The target audience is those who enjoy deep thinking and philosophy enthusiasts, with a writing tone that is profound, speculative, and rigorous.
  • ✨ Provides reading focus points and knowledge base structure for philosophical speculative analysis
  • ✨ Specifies required sections such as introduction, proposition analysis, and spiritual portrait
  • ✨ Emphasizes logical reasoning and references to philosophical theories
  • ✨ Target audience is deep thinkers and philosophy enthusiasts
  • ✨ Writing tone is profound, speculative, and rigorous
297 words · ~2 min read
  • Philosophical Analysis
  • Speculative Style
  • Document Extraction
  • Structured Information
  • Knowledge Base
  • Deep Thinking
  • Logical Reasoning

Table of Contents

Philosophical Speculation Style Analysis ReportReading Focus PointsKnowledge Base StructureCompression StrategyStyle PositioningCore PrinciplesRequired Chapter StructureIntroduction: Core PropositionsProposition AnalysisIntellectual PortraitConclusion: Significance and ImplicationsReference Philosophical FrameworksQuality Checklist

Philosophical Speculation Style Analysis Report

Reading Focus Points

When reading each file, focus on extracting:

  • File path and title
  • Core propositions and assertions
  • Value judgments and stances
  • Reflections on fundamental questions
  • Inquiries into meaning
  • Logical reasoning processes
  • Connections to philosophical concepts

Special Attention: Discussions concerning "what is," "why," and "how should"; themes such as existence, freedom, meaning, and value.

Knowledge Base Structure

### File Index
| File Path | Title | Philosophical Relevance | Core Proposition |
|-----------|-------|-------------------------|------------------|

### Proposition Index
| Proposition | Argumentation | Philosophical Dimension | Source File |
|-------------|---------------|-------------------------|-------------|

### Value Judgment Index
| Judgment | Basis | Type of Value | Source File |
|----------|-------|---------------|-------------|

### Fundamental Inquiry Index
| Question | Author's Stance | Philosophical Reference | Source File |
|----------|-----------------|-------------------------|-------------|

### Thought Characteristics Record
| Dimension | Manifestation | Evidence | Source File |
|-----------|---------------|----------|-------------|
(Dimensions: Epistemology, Ontology, Ethics, Axiology)

Compression Strategy

When compressing the knowledge base is necessary:

  1. Must Retain: File Index, Proposition Index, Fundamental Inquiry Index
  2. Can Be Streamlined: Value Judgment Index (retain core judgments), Thought Characteristics (retain main dimensions)
  3. Can Be Discarded: Detailed processes of secondary arguments

Style Positioning

Adopt a philosophical perspective to conduct deep reflection and analysis of the content, exploring its underlying meaning and value.

Target Audience: Readers who enjoy deep thinking, philosophy enthusiasts Writing Tone: Profound, speculative, rigorous Purpose: To provoke reader thought and reflection, elevating cognitive levels

Core Principles

  • ✅ Based on logical reasoning
  • ✅ Reference or contrast with philosophical theories
  • ✅ Pose questions with depth
  • ✅ Explore essence and meaning
  • ❌ Avoid empty accumulation of philosophical jargon

Required Chapter Structure

Introduction: Core Propositions

Propose 2-3 core philosophical propositions.

This article will explore the following core propositions:

1.  [Proposition 1]: Concerning the essential question of [theme]
2.  [Proposition 2]: Concerning the value question of [theme]
3.  [Proposition 3]: Concerning the practical question of [theme]

Proposition Analysis

Conduct in-depth analysis of each proposition:

## [Proposition Title]

### The Presentation of the Question

[Describe the background and importance of the question]

### The Stance in the Text

[Analyze the attitude towards this question in the original text, citing specific content]

> "[Quote from the original text]"
> —— [Source](../path/to/file.md)

### Philosophical Reference

[Analyze by referencing or contrasting with relevant philosophical theories]

-   From the perspective of [philosopher/school of thought]...
-   This forms a connection/contrast with [philosophical concept]...

### Deeper Interpretation

[Propose a deeper understanding and insight]

Intellectual Portrait

Based on philosophical analysis, depict the thought characteristics of the content creator:

  • Epistemological stance
  • Ontological tendency
  • Ethical orientation
  • Axiological features

Conclusion: Significance and Implications

  • Implications for the reader
  • Significance for the era
  • Unresolved questions

Reference Philosophical Frameworks

  • Existentialism: Existence, freedom, choice, responsibility
  • Pragmatism: Practice, utility, truth
  • Phenomenology: Consciousness, experience, intentionality
  • Critical Theory: Power, emancipation, critique
  • Eastern Philosophy: Dao, Wu Wei (non-action), the Mean

Quality Checklist

  • Propositions are clear and explicit
  • Analysis possesses logical depth
  • Philosophical references are appropriate
  • Not a mere accumulation of jargon
  • All links are valid

See Also